Skip to content

Comparisons, with the figures and their conditions

Five decisions that come up repeatedly: two formats, two grades of the same family, and two chemistries. Each page opens with the answer, then shows the table it came from.

Most comparison pages are written to rank, not to be used. They list specs without the conditions attached to them, which is how a 60 A cell ends up specified into a pack that can only cool it to 30 A.

These five pages are written the other way round. Each one starts with the conclusion, then gives the table behind it, then explains where the conclusion stops being true. Where a figure is not published in the source we hold, the table says so — a missing value is more useful than an invented one.

How to read these

Three questions worth asking of any comparison

Is the current figure conditional? A continuous discharge rating only holds while the cell stays inside the manufacturer temperature cut-off. If a table does not say what that condition is, the number is not comparable with one that does.

Is the capacity typical or minimum? Designing runtime against a typical figure means designing against a value the manufacturer does not guarantee. For a worst-case calculation, use minimum.

Is the part actually obtainable? A comparison between two cells where only one can be sourced in volume is an academic exercise. Availability is a specification.

WhatsApp